<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can Researchers Read Your Mind?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bustachange.com/can-researchers-read-your-mind/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bustachange.com/can-researchers-read-your-mind/</link>
	<description>Fanatic About Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:38:42 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jerad Kaliher</title>
		<link>http://www.bustachange.com/can-researchers-read-your-mind/comment-page-1/#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerad Kaliher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 06:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bustachange.com/can-researchers-read-your-mind/#comment-484</guid>
		<description>@Wayne Smallman, I agree whole-heartedly that this is a bit on the extreme side. The quality of focus groups and selection of those participants is important but the way the experiment is conducted is equally important.

This may offer a way for researchers to compile further data. But I have my doubts about it being used independently until the data comes in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Wayne Smallman, I agree whole-heartedly that this is a bit on the extreme side. The quality of focus groups and selection of those participants is important but the way the experiment is conducted is equally important.</p>
<p>This may offer a way for researchers to compile further data. But I have my doubts about it being used independently until the data comes in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Smallman</title>
		<link>http://www.bustachange.com/can-researchers-read-your-mind/comment-page-1/#comment-482</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Smallman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bustachange.com/can-researchers-read-your-mind/#comment-482</guid>
		<description>As extreme marketing tactics go, this is out there with the best of &#039;em.

While this kind of research will offer an insight into the thinking of the study group, it&#039;s the &quot;quality&quot; of the study group which will ultimately decide the quality of the data they gather...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As extreme marketing tactics go, this is out there with the best of &#8216;em.</p>
<p>While this kind of research will offer an insight into the thinking of the study group, it&#8217;s the &#8220;quality&#8221; of the study group which will ultimately decide the quality of the data they gather&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerad Kaliher</title>
		<link>http://www.bustachange.com/can-researchers-read-your-mind/comment-page-1/#comment-480</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerad Kaliher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bustachange.com/can-researchers-read-your-mind/#comment-480</guid>
		<description>@nicusor, as of now the headset is being used in paid and voluntary trials. But I wouldn&#039;t put it past researchers to try to develop it into a hat to make the participants less aware that they are being monitored.

And yes, I agree with you. People do tend to respond very differently when they know they are being watched. The same goes for self-reporting research as well though, so nothing is really all that different there. The difference is whether or not being able to monitor their physiological responses will gain further insight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@nicusor, as of now the headset is being used in paid and voluntary trials. But I wouldn&#8217;t put it past researchers to try to develop it into a hat to make the participants less aware that they are being monitored.</p>
<p>And yes, I agree with you. People do tend to respond very differently when they know they are being watched. The same goes for self-reporting research as well though, so nothing is really all that different there. The difference is whether or not being able to monitor their physiological responses will gain further insight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nicusor</title>
		<link>http://www.bustachange.com/can-researchers-read-your-mind/comment-page-1/#comment-478</link>
		<dc:creator>nicusor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bustachange.com/can-researchers-read-your-mind/#comment-478</guid>
		<description>Ok, so maybe they have the technology... but how they intend to use it? 

I mean, they will chase people with that SF headset to gather info?!? :)

I know they already gathered data, but people tend to response differently in real life rather than when they know they are used for researching... 

Just my opinion... 

Nick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, so maybe they have the technology&#8230; but how they intend to use it? </p>
<p>I mean, they will chase people with that SF headset to gather info?!? <img src='http://www.bustachange.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I know they already gathered data, but people tend to response differently in real life rather than when they know they are used for researching&#8230; </p>
<p>Just my opinion&#8230; </p>
<p>Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

